April 2004
CAMUS meets show MANMAN strategies
Manufacturing sites look at ERP futures, potential
By Terry Floyd
Shaggy Carey of the Support Group, inc. welcomed a
larger-than-expected crowd to this springs CAMUS RUG Meeting in
Tulsa, noting that it had been many years since there had been a
users group meeting for MANMAN users in Oklahoma.
There were about 17 people in the room when the
meeting started, but several others joined during the morning. Shaggy
was gratified to see a 4-to-1 ratio of users to vendors, the opposite
of the turnout at the three prior South Central RUG Meetings, held in
Texas during 2003. Everyone in the room introduced themselves and
talked about what they did with MANMAN. Both platforms, MPE and VMS,
were represented, but no MK users attended.
9:30AM: I introduced the mornings speaker,
long-time MANMAN/hp applications manager Ken Beebe of Kennametal in
Rogers, Ark. Ken spoke for an hour and a half on his experiences
using MANMAN/MPE and how his company has extended the standard
software with their own and some bolt-on additions. Two divisions of
Kennametal are using 6.2 and 8.2 Releases as foundations for their
ERP efforts. These 10-15 year-old versions of MANMAN have been
transformed significantly by programmers and consultants at
Kennametal, formerly a division of Harbor Group called Greenfield
Industries.
Ken has been overseeing the use of MANMAN as an
applications manager in the IT department at the manufacturing site
in Rogers for over 18 years. He provided extensive handouts and
slides with examples of the main changes to MANMAN at the sites for
which he has responsibility.
Ken pointed out that differentiation is difficult,
especially in some of the commodity-product businesses that
Kennametal has acquired as it grew to over $2 billion in annual
sales. In their Metal Working and Materials Solutions Groups, they
have always been very sensitive to serving their customers
whims. This means customization of products (especially packaging)
and processes to meet their clients demands.
Responsiveness to customer requests for particular
processing methods caused many of the changes that have been done to
MANMAN by Kens teams over the years. Other changes have been
brought about by the need to interface to other systems.
Five of Kennametals seven major divisions use
MANMAN on HP 3000s operated from two large data centers in two
separate Southern states. The other two divisions have gone to SAP.
All the rest will go from MANMAN to SAP someday, but not any time
soon. MANMAN is still growing in use at Kennametal, where they have
been off support and free to do whatever they wanted to
do to MANMAN for over 10 years.
Kennametals other divisions had gone to SAP to
consolidate their disparate home-grown software. When they bought
these divisions running MANMAN, Kennametal executives discovered that
there was already a flexible, integrated, customizable system in
place. They also noticed that there are 10 people supporting MANMAN
instead of the 40 IT staff members supporting SAP in the other
divisions.
Ken is currently talking about getting off of MANMAN
in the 2006 to 2008 timeframe.
11AM: Lunch and preparation for discussion during
CAMUS Conference Call. Not very many questions needed urgent answers
for this group of seasoned MANMAN veterans. Some of the attendees
were new to MANMAN (only a few years of experience), but the
companies they work for have been using MANMAN a long time.
Noon: CAMUS Conference Call. Seven RUGS hooked up on
a conference call moderated by the CAMUS staff and Board of
Directors. There were not many questions about the role of CAMUS.
Everyone seems to be in agreement that the annual meeting and the RUG
Meetings provide value because users need to talk to other users and
to all third-party vendors, advisers, and consultants to hear as many
competing opinions as possible.
1:25PM: Sue Peyton of SSA spoke on SSAs Product
Directions and answered questions. (See the CAMUS newsletters and Web
sites for more details, as well as the December, 2003 NewsWire). SSA
is still talking with HP about emulator and migration options, so
MANMAN/MPE may not be dead yet.
2PM: Birket Foster of MB Foster Associates
(1-800-ANSWERS, lest someone forget) temporarily put on his
Chairman of OpenMPE hat for about 10 minutes and gave a
very open and honest opinion of the state of HP 3000 migration in
early 04. Everyone agrees theres no hurry to get rid of
your MPE machines unless you are a really huge company needing six
years or more to convert.
Plans for how you are going to stay on MPE are
essential at this point, according to Foster, but are easy compared
to plans for migration. OpenMPE is doing what it can to represent
companies who want to stay on HP 3000 hardware, including plans for
custodial functions after Hewlett Packard exits the market in 2007.
Birket used the year 2010 as a date when concern may begin to grow,
but there are a lot of things that could happen to extend that date.
It turned into a wide-ranging discussion of topics
relevant to all MANMAN users. Birket fielded several questions from
the crowd about migration products in general and his own
MBF-UDACentral product in particular. It was a helpful discussion,
relevant even to MANMAN/VMS users because of the feeling that
theyll be going through the same things in five or 10 years,
depending on Carly Fiorinas successes and failures.
Special thanks from Shaggy to John Stevens of
eXegeSys who donated several door prizes and challenges other
third-parties to help Shaggy out at the next meeting.
The meeting adjourned about 3PM. As usual, almost
everyone learned something valuable to take back to their job from an
unexpected person in an unexpected way at an unexpected time. Is it
serendipity or do good things happen at these meetings because users
have so much in common? The only way to find out is to attend the
meeting yourself next time. Supporting CAMUS is more important now
than ever before.
Terry Floyd is founder of the Support Group, inc., a
third party support and ERP solutions company, as well as a past
chair of SIG-MANMAN.
|