October 2002
Number 79
(Update of Volume 7, Issue 12)
SSA puts brakes on further MANMAN
enhancements
Taking a cue from HP 3000 application provider Amisys LLC,
SSA announced at its conference in Las Vegas this month that the
MANMAN ERP application suite running on hundreds of HP 3000s and many
OpenVMS systems won't be getting any more features or enhancements by
way of major releases. SSA left the door open for future
enhancements, but said they would be released one by one as bug fixes
are released, and not in a "version upgrade." The CAMUS user group
immediately issued a statement in reply to the effect of "this
isn't over yet," and users of the application started talking
about how they could take over the application code and put it in the
hands of more enthusiastic owners.
Warren Smith, president of the manufacturing software user
group, wants to arrange a conference call of 30-50 MANMAN customers
to talk about options to keep MANMAN viable. "We are thinking
about forming a core working group, as well as getting the [CAMUS]
RUGs involved. This must be done sooner than later!
Shortly on the CAMUS Web site you will see a form for ideas and
suggestions which we can use to get started."
MANMAN sites can e-mail Smith directly at
warren.smith@danavictor.com. He'd like you to use the subject line
"Manman Product Direction." Next year's CAMUS meeting in
the Dallas area (May, 2003), we will have SSA GT on hand, and Smith
wants input on SSA's MANMAN alternatives being put into an "ERP
bake-off' of all the SSA products -- BPCS/KBM/PRMS/MAX+/MK."
Earlier this year Amisys announced that its 11.01 version of
the HP 3000 application for healthcare would be the last MPE release.
HP has convinced many of these packaged application vendors to stop
HP 3000 development, spreading concerns about the future of the
3000's ecosystem. MANMAN's 3000 customer base, probably the largest
in numbers, might be among the first to make a case for continuing
with their application beyond their vendors' plans -- simply because
so many of the sites are outside of SSA's support already. Making the
picture more complex is the fact that SSA is a strong provider in the
IBM iSeries marketplace, where BPCS is a major contender.
SSA told customers at its Global Client Forum that customers
on support can move license for license to any of the other SSA
products, but for the 3000 sites that means a shift away from their
computer environment. SSA makes no other 3000 software, and its 12.0
version of MANMAN is its last.
In a bit of irony, Smith said that his company finds the
freeze on MANMAN releases something of a relief. "The 'No new
Versions' statement by SSA simplifies our program development and
modification process," he said in a letter to
members. "No longer do I need to be as careful when making
mods so they will not interfere with future releases. So far to
date, no modifications have touched the core database (we are at
11.3). This has caused additional costs in the past, which we now
will not see. I am still considering the impact of core system mods
until the dust settles over the next few months - we will still stick
to the path of no database changes for the near term."
The prior owners of MANMAN, Computer Associates, haven't
exactly been generous with enhancements over the last decade,
according to Smith. "In the past 10 years we have seen few CA
supplied enhancements -- for the few enhancements that I would like
to have, we either have already coded them years ago, or can add it
to our internal list or utilize third parties." This might be
one exit of a vendor from the application space that creates not a
bang, but a whisper.
MPE-IMAGE ought to be untied
HP World meetings delivered hope to homesteading customers as
promised in our September FlashPaper item. But the pronouncements
about HP's intentions toward MPE and IMAGE show the company wants to
maintain a close hand over the future of the 3000's heart for the
next four years, and maybe longer. Why HP wants to do this deserves
some serious study.
HP reports that it believes it is the best entity to take
care of MPE-Image beyond its end of sales in a little over 12 months.
HP is asking if open source is really a high priority for customers
remaining on the platform, and the vendor is to be commended for
keeping an open mind. We'd just like to see HP open its mind wider,
for the benefit of its many customers who will not migrate.
While open source might be interesting, there's another, much
more important activity: Getting MPE into the hands of an
organization that will grow the environment's potential. Customers
who will not migrate -- a serious enough portion of the multi-billion
dollar 3000 business still flying under HP's flag -- need a new MPE
owner, not a trusty steward who will only fix bugs and ensure nothing
gets mislaid for the next four years. There's still growth potential
in this market, if someone can address a sizable installed base.
We'd like to see an MPE-Image transfer to an organization
dedicated to the environment's growth become a part of CSY's to-do
lists. Holding onto a discontinued product, for the express reason
that "we don't think anybody can do it as well," fails to
serve the needs of the customers who are not moving away. I leave it
as a study of business strategy for others to observe why HP's
holding onto MPE-Image might be otherwise so important.
Earlier this weekend HP's Jeff Vance, who holds a seat on the
OpenMPE board of directors, reminded customers who subscribe to the
OpenMPE mailing list that "Nothing comes for free. Priorities
need to be clear so that CSY focuses on the most important
activities."
Executing a clean release of MPE-Image, now, could save HP
millions of dollars, pehaps billions. Judging by the customers' wan
appetite for change over the first year of the Transition, it appears
unlikely that sales of alternative HP servers to the dismissed
MPE-Image customers could have the same kind of impact on HP's bottom
line.
All this doesn't mean that migration advocates won't have
their business opportunities. It's just that this future gives
customers a true choice -- to stay with a platform that still has
growth in its future, or leave for the open systems world of
commodity computing. At the moment, MPE-Image is fighting with one
hand tied behind its back.
HP puts emulators into MPE's
path
Hearts skipped a beat here at the NewsWire when we learned
that HP has just begun to mail a new roadmap of the 3000's future, a
poster with the word "Emulators" at the end of one path. At
first it appeared the vendor was giving full confidence to the
project that will produce a Hardware Emulator running on Intel chips,
a way to let the 3000 hardware live on well past the date HP stops
building the computer. Other customers suggested a more likely
meaning for the new word on the roadmap: software designed to emulate
the MPE environment on non-3000 systems, products such as Ordina
Denkart's MPUX or Neartek's AMXW. Since the posters are a
conceptualization of the future, maybe both definitions of emulator
will apply in time.
At least one emulator company has decided to "go ahead
in principle" with a project to create a hardware emulator,
according to OpenMPE's chairman Jon Backus. SRI's Robert Boers told
Backus that "A decision to go ahead with the design is not yet a
decision to put a product on the market, which -- in our opinion --
is premature. Our experience with [our] VAX emulator is that there is
no market until sales of new equipment has stopped for at least a
year. This in spite of the very 'vocal' opinions I have seen in the
OpenMPE forum (and also from the similar VAX community in the past).
Also, emulator purchases are driven by corporate needs, not by
individual enthousiasts. The many 'first hour' companies testing the
VAX emulator prototype generated an insignificant percentage of
revenue."
SRI, which has been selling a VAX hardware emulator for
several year, will first focus "in R&D on a high performance
CPU implementation (simple interpretation will not work well for a
RISC CPU) and a few basic components so that we can publish a
prototype for tests at large. The latter will not be before summer
2003, though."
Interex board vote impacts
leadership
It's election season, and a less-obvious election might
influence what kind of impact the Interex user group will have on the
future of MPE and IMAGE. Two candidates are vying for a single open
seat on the Interex board of directors. If you're a member, head off
to <http://www.interex.org/inside/brdcand02.html>
to see backgrounds on Denys Beauchemin and Dillon Pyron. Denys is
campaigning from an incumbent position, and so has made public
statements about MPE and the 3000's future that a careful voter can
track all the way back to last December.
The great thing about incumbents running for election is the
record they can stand upon. Interex members -- who still can cast
their ballots for a few weeks -- can first look over a statement over
the Internet from the weeks just after HP's 3000 discontinuance
announcement: <http://raven.utc.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?A2=ind0112B&L=hp3000-l&P=R9305&D=0
>
For those with full access, you can then read Denys' Interex
editorial at <http://www.interex.org/hpworldnews/hpw205/pub_hpw_news15.jsp>
(That second Web address is locked up behind a password check
for Interex members only. We searched for the editorial in a public
Interex area, but couldn't find it.)
We believe Denys is referring to the 3000's future when
saying he means to "finish what he started." Interex
inaugurated a task force about the HP 3000's condition in the weeks
following last Nov. 14. Mounting a task force is the sort of thing a
user group does, and worth checking up on to see what's resulted from
the force.
Cast your vote in the Interex election, regardless of who you
support. Better participation in the group's voting will benefit the
3000 customers who rely on Interex. Advocacy is still listed among
the user group's missions, pressure that only an independent
organization can apply on customers' behalf.
A-, N-Class firmware gets update
It's rare, but it's happened: HP released a firmware upgrade
for an HP 3000 model. The A-Class and N-Class systems which are
moving off HP's price lists -- that is, the original generation of
these PCI-based 3000s, not the newer ones that just started shipping
-- have got a firmware patch. HP reports the patch named
PF_CPREGSPA0111 corrects a memory leak in the systems, albeit a slow
one, at 220 bytes per hour.
COBOL II gets fix for performance
bog
HP's released patch COBMXB0A to correct a performance
slowdown in the HP COBOL compiler that appeared as of the 6.5 release
of MPE/iX. Runtime performance started taking a hit as a result of
that COBOL II A.04.20 version first shipped with 6.5, and HP's patch
corrects the problem. While HP believes very few customer programs
will encounter the slowdown, its supplying the fix nonetheless -- as
well as offering proof that COBOL is still being cared for at HP.
HP hires for print and services, lays
off in servers
Hiring is still happening at the new HP, but the staff is
being added in areas far from HP's enterprise systems such as the
3000. The company confirmed in a meeting with Gartner analysts last
week that it's hired 2,300 staffers since it merged with Compaq, and
"much of that is in imaging and printing," according to HP
CEO Carly Fiorina, as well as in managed services such as the recent
CIBC bank outsourcing project. Rueters reported that Fiorina said
many of the newest round of 1,800 layoffs will take place in HP's
enterprise computing operations.
|